Model Comparison

Side-by-Side Comparison of Monte Carlo vs Double Gaussian Models with Statistical Validation

Interactive Model Comparison

50 nm
193 nm
0.85
100,000
--
MC Accuracy (%)
--
DG Accuracy (%)
--
MC Speed (s)
--
DG Speed (s)
Monte Carlo Model
Particle-based simulation with statistical sampling
Pros:
• High accuracy for complex geometries
• Handles arbitrary shapes
• Statistical uncertainty quantification
• Physically realistic
Cons:
• Computationally expensive
• Requires many particles
• Statistical noise
• Longer simulation time
Double Gaussian Model
Analytical PSF with FFT convolution
Pros:
• Very fast computation
• Deterministic results
• Low memory usage
• Easy to implement
Cons:
• Limited to simple geometries
• Approximate solution
• Less physically accurate
• Fixed PSF shape

Detailed Comparison

Metric Monte Carlo Double Gaussian Winner
Accuracy -- -- --
Speed -- -- --
Memory Usage -- -- --
Precision -- -- --