Skip to main content
Back to Project
Electronics & Photonics
Model Comparison
Side-by-Side Comparison of Monte Carlo vs Double Gaussian Models with Statistical Validation
Interactive Model Comparison
Feature Size (nm)
50 nm
Wavelength (nm)
193 nm
Numerical Aperture
0.85
Monte Carlo Particles
100,000
Comparison Metric
Accuracy
Speed
Memory Usage
Precision
Validation Method
Statistical
Experimental
Theoretical
Run Model Comparison
--
MC Accuracy (%)
--
DG Accuracy (%)
--
MC Speed (s)
--
DG Speed (s)
Monte Carlo Model
Particle-based simulation with statistical sampling
Pros:
• High accuracy for complex geometries
• Handles arbitrary shapes
• Statistical uncertainty quantification
• Physically realistic
Cons:
• Computationally expensive
• Requires many particles
• Statistical noise
• Longer simulation time
Double Gaussian Model
Analytical PSF with FFT convolution
Pros:
• Very fast computation
• Deterministic results
• Low memory usage
• Easy to implement
Cons:
• Limited to simple geometries
• Approximate solution
• Less physically accurate
• Fixed PSF shape
Detailed Comparison
Metric
Monte Carlo
Double Gaussian
Winner
Accuracy
--
--
--
Speed
--
--
--
Memory Usage
--
--
--
Precision
--
--
--